From the Washington Post, June 6, 2013, by Tom Jackman
Prince William County’s new two-blue-square logo is being pulled down from county letterhead and signs, county clothes and county vehicles after the Board of Supervisors decided Tuesday it wasn’t ready for prime time, yet. Supervisor John Jenkins (D-Neabsco) said the public hadn’t had a chance to weigh in on the logo, and “I didn’t want to see us bring some kind of logo out here that had no meaning to the people of Prince William County.”
Supervisor Peter Candland (R-Gainesville) said the logo should articulate the identity of the county, not just be a symbol. “This logo was meant to mean something,” Candland said.
So the board, in addition to issuing a “cease, desist and rescind” directive to county staff, ordered up a work session for July 16, to decide the next step in rebranding the county.
County communications director Jason Grant said the logo was developed as part of a process to unify Prince William’s marketing approach. A design firm in Michigan, familiar to Prince William economic development official Brent Heavner who previously worked in Michigan, was enlisted to come up with a design, and agreed to do it for $750, Grant said. Board members wondered Tuesday why a local company couldn’t have been involved.
Grant said the design was shown to all the supervisors except Jenkins, and that most approved. But Jenkins felt the board should have voted on it and allowed the public to participate in the process. He was surprised to see it starting to turn up all over the county without a board vote or a public hearing. “The approval process,” Jenkins said, “just bothers the dickens out of me.”
Jenkins’ directive to suspend use of the logo was based in part on the public’s “overall dislike for the design of the proposed logo.” As proof, he cited a Washington Post online poll from these very environs, where 70 percent of the 400-plus respondents voted, “It’s bad. Start over.” Seventeen percent voted, “It’s OK,” and 13 percent voted for, “I like it. It’s a keeper.”
Candland said the mission of the logo was to represent Prince William County to the world.
“We spent $750,” Candland said, “to develop a logo that represents hopefully hundreds of millions of dollars in Prince William County. I think we’re selling ourselves short.”
Candland said county uniforms were being changed, county decals were being changed, and this was “a much broader change than was ever portrayed to me.” The logo was intended to replace individual agency logos with one county-wide logo. “I don’t think the logo was properly vetted,” Candland said. “For a Michigan firm to develop the face of our economic development department is troubling to me.”
Tuesday, June 25, 2013
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Think you need an icon with your logo?
Many business people think that a logo can only be successful if it has an icon, such as the Nike swoosh, the little Tivo guy, the Mercedes modified peace sign, or the NBC peacock.
However, the world's best-known and most beloved brands don't use an icon. Check out the small sampling below and you'll see what we mean. A text-only logo done in an interesting and memorable way is a terrific way to brand your business.
If you're looking to brand or rebrand your business, contact Julie & Company today at 301-330-9353 or info@julieandcompany.com so we can create an effective logo for you.
However, the world's best-known and most beloved brands don't use an icon. Check out the small sampling below and you'll see what we mean. A text-only logo done in an interesting and memorable way is a terrific way to brand your business.
If you're looking to brand or rebrand your business, contact Julie & Company today at 301-330-9353 or info@julieandcompany.com so we can create an effective logo for you.
Ax the acronyms!
When it comes to company names, I am adamant: NO acronyms. Why? Because they are impossible to remember and impossible to brand.
Maybe I'm more sensitive to this problem because I grew up in the Washington area which is awash in acronyms. Over 140,000 people here work for Federal agencies, - DoD, CIA, FBI, FDA, FEMA, etc. - so many that George Washington University has put together a glossary! These agencies compound the problem by creating more and more acronyms within their organizations. Life is just one big can of alphabet soup.
So if you're choosing a corporate or product name, skip the acronym. No one will remember which three letters you've chosen. Ever. Is it MBA or MAB or AMB? Only the business owner knows for sure.
Another reason to avoid acronyms? Other organizations already have your three letters no matter which three letters they are. For example, take ATG. A quick Google search shows that ATG stands for:
|
|
This makes ATG - or any other acronym - impossible to brand. Branding is all about uniqueness. If your company name is the same as a gazillion other companies' names, you're not unique - and your company is difficult if not impossible to brand.
So do the right thing: ax the acronyms!
So do the right thing: ax the acronyms!
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
Removing Fear to Build Your Brand | TalentZoo.com
From Removing Fear to Build Your Brand - TalentZoo.com by Martin Lindstrom
What do weapons, burglar alarms, and condoms have in common? Their sales all boomed in 2009 with condom sales up 22 percent since 2008. Why?
The answer can perhaps be found in Nigeria and Chile -- two countries I visited on my globetrotting tour promoting "Buyology." Surprisingly, neither country has detected the "R" word. When asking government officials why that was the case, the explanation was simple: The media simply hadn’t picked it up yet. As no-one had read about it, the recession, therefore, never arrived.
Is this whole thing just a well-orchestrated media story, containing one essential ingredient, fear?
When you’re told that the world soon will go under due to a gigantic financial crises, what is the first thing you do? Save money. Suddenly the local retailer around the corner will lose revenue from your less frequent visits and fire staff -- the same staff who now will spend less -- and buy less in your company. You’ve just witnessed the cycles of a self-fulfilling prophecy.
As sophisticated as we seem to be, we still should remind ourselves that our ancient brothers were monkeys with basic needs: sex, food, survival, and sleep. Even though we may convince ourselves that our lives are much more sophisticated than that, exactly those parameters seem surprisingly dominant when push comes to shove and the recession starts dominating the world situation, explaining why condom, weapon, and burglar alarm sales have increased.
A recent neuroscience study shows that fear drives us more than we ever would admit. Hate it or love it. The fear of losing my job, fear of losing out on my school-fee payments for my kids, or fear of ending up in the gutter. Thoughts so scary for anyone to think about that we clock into panic mode.
Remember fear and sex are two of our main drivers, and thus factors, which at the end of the day, take control once we’re in survival mode. When President Johnson ran his Daisy TV commercial up to his election, a commercial that used an A-bomb to illustrate what would happen if he wasn’t elected, the voters hated it. When junior Bush did the same in 2004 -- showing wolves entering the boarder as a metaphor to illustrate how terrorism would take over the entire country -- people hated it. However, both TV commercials had profound effects on our amygdale, a region in our brain responsible for generating fear. Yes, the voters hated both commercials when asked, yet the scan surprisingly indicated that voters still would cast a vote in favor of these politicians. They simply couldn’t resist.
Since the very beginning of the U.S. recession, the Big Three automakers have offered steep discounts in order to get rid of their cars. A majority of their cars are sold at cost, yet still no one wants to buy their cars. The fundamental problem isn’t that the cars are useless; the problem is the proposition, which has forgotten to take fear into account. Of course, no one wants to buy a car if they’re afraid of being fired tomorrow. Hyundai realized this and began to offer cars attached with an assurance: "Buy any new Hyundai, and if in the next year you lose your income, we’ll let you return it.”
In just a month Hyundai increased its sales with more than 20 percent in the U.S. alone. The returned cars? Well, so far supposedly only two cars have been returned.
Building brands in recessions is all about fear management -- to fundamentally understand how fear works, why we react as we do, and what the consequences of this are in our purchase behavior. Fear often is as irrational as everything else in our lives. When a plane drops from the sky, the airline industry knows that people fly up to 10 percent less weeks after. You don’t have to be a statistical genius to know the chances of a second plane crashing days after are substantial lower than before. All this means is that irrational propositions often are substantially more powerful than a steep discount.
Over the past months, a flurry of new banks have hit the ground in the U.S. -- banks with no track record, clear history, and unknown personnel. Their proposition is simple (We’re new, with no Wall Street links or links to the past), and consumers love it. Can you imagine such proposition just two years ago?
What does neuroscience tell us in order to cater for the consequences of a financial recession and build surviving brands? Here are three points.
There’s always good news in bad times.
One of the oldest tricks in innovation is not to ask consumers for what they want but for the problems they see. Believe me, we see a lot of problems! The fact is we rarely know what we want, but we’re amazing in pointing out problems. No one knew they wanted an airbag, but they knew they wanted safer cars. No one knew they wanted toilet seat covers, but they knew they hated to place toilet paper individually on the seat.
Ask yourself what are the problems consumers are facing during the recession? There’s a lot -- like they no longer can afford to travel to exotic destinations for holidays (which might be why those French perfumes seem to sell well; it’s kind of a whiff of Paris). We’re bored; we can’t afford fancy dinners anymore (which is why the sales of Lindt chocolate, McDonald’s, and Rubik's Cubes are going through the roof). We’re afraid of putting our money into stocks or banks (which is the reason why collectors' gold coins sold out twice last year in the U.S.). Start your innovation circle by letting the consumer point out all the problems, then convert these into problems.
Add a practical dimension to an irrational decision.
It has become fashionable to save and only buy on discount -- no matter who you are. What do you do as a brand owner? (Remember, discounting your brand typically takes seven years to recover!) The answer is simple: Add a practical dimension to the equation (explaining why a brand like Willeys boots is selling through the roof -- they’re practical as hell). No one wants to buy a fancy jacket at the moment, but if you’re able to add a practical dimension to your product, like designing the jacket so that the customers can turn the jacket inside out, featuring a second color (matching the evening dress), you’ve armed the consumer with a rational argument helping to lock in the deal. The fact may be that the consumer in reality is buying the jacket because they love the design, yet in recession times such arguments don’t hold -- the practical dimension does.
The systematic removal of fear.
Hyundai did it, and a stream of new banks are doing it: identifying the underlying reasoning why consumers won’t buy their services by fundamentally understanding fear and building a new and better product offering around it.
Sales might be down, but do you really know why? Answers citing the recession are invalid and useless. What counts is to understand the fundamental role of fear and to turn this around to strengthen your brand. The pre-war time in the '40s gave birth to some of the world’s greatest brands. These brands all had one thing in common: They turned a threat into an opportunity. I see no reason why you shouldn’t be able to do the same.
What do weapons, burglar alarms, and condoms have in common? Their sales all boomed in 2009 with condom sales up 22 percent since 2008. Why?
The answer can perhaps be found in Nigeria and Chile -- two countries I visited on my globetrotting tour promoting "Buyology." Surprisingly, neither country has detected the "R" word. When asking government officials why that was the case, the explanation was simple: The media simply hadn’t picked it up yet. As no-one had read about it, the recession, therefore, never arrived.
Is this whole thing just a well-orchestrated media story, containing one essential ingredient, fear?
When you’re told that the world soon will go under due to a gigantic financial crises, what is the first thing you do? Save money. Suddenly the local retailer around the corner will lose revenue from your less frequent visits and fire staff -- the same staff who now will spend less -- and buy less in your company. You’ve just witnessed the cycles of a self-fulfilling prophecy.
As sophisticated as we seem to be, we still should remind ourselves that our ancient brothers were monkeys with basic needs: sex, food, survival, and sleep. Even though we may convince ourselves that our lives are much more sophisticated than that, exactly those parameters seem surprisingly dominant when push comes to shove and the recession starts dominating the world situation, explaining why condom, weapon, and burglar alarm sales have increased.
A recent neuroscience study shows that fear drives us more than we ever would admit. Hate it or love it. The fear of losing my job, fear of losing out on my school-fee payments for my kids, or fear of ending up in the gutter. Thoughts so scary for anyone to think about that we clock into panic mode.
Remember fear and sex are two of our main drivers, and thus factors, which at the end of the day, take control once we’re in survival mode. When President Johnson ran his Daisy TV commercial up to his election, a commercial that used an A-bomb to illustrate what would happen if he wasn’t elected, the voters hated it. When junior Bush did the same in 2004 -- showing wolves entering the boarder as a metaphor to illustrate how terrorism would take over the entire country -- people hated it. However, both TV commercials had profound effects on our amygdale, a region in our brain responsible for generating fear. Yes, the voters hated both commercials when asked, yet the scan surprisingly indicated that voters still would cast a vote in favor of these politicians. They simply couldn’t resist.
Since the very beginning of the U.S. recession, the Big Three automakers have offered steep discounts in order to get rid of their cars. A majority of their cars are sold at cost, yet still no one wants to buy their cars. The fundamental problem isn’t that the cars are useless; the problem is the proposition, which has forgotten to take fear into account. Of course, no one wants to buy a car if they’re afraid of being fired tomorrow. Hyundai realized this and began to offer cars attached with an assurance: "Buy any new Hyundai, and if in the next year you lose your income, we’ll let you return it.”
In just a month Hyundai increased its sales with more than 20 percent in the U.S. alone. The returned cars? Well, so far supposedly only two cars have been returned.
Building brands in recessions is all about fear management -- to fundamentally understand how fear works, why we react as we do, and what the consequences of this are in our purchase behavior. Fear often is as irrational as everything else in our lives. When a plane drops from the sky, the airline industry knows that people fly up to 10 percent less weeks after. You don’t have to be a statistical genius to know the chances of a second plane crashing days after are substantial lower than before. All this means is that irrational propositions often are substantially more powerful than a steep discount.
Over the past months, a flurry of new banks have hit the ground in the U.S. -- banks with no track record, clear history, and unknown personnel. Their proposition is simple (We’re new, with no Wall Street links or links to the past), and consumers love it. Can you imagine such proposition just two years ago?
What does neuroscience tell us in order to cater for the consequences of a financial recession and build surviving brands? Here are three points.
There’s always good news in bad times.
One of the oldest tricks in innovation is not to ask consumers for what they want but for the problems they see. Believe me, we see a lot of problems! The fact is we rarely know what we want, but we’re amazing in pointing out problems. No one knew they wanted an airbag, but they knew they wanted safer cars. No one knew they wanted toilet seat covers, but they knew they hated to place toilet paper individually on the seat.
Ask yourself what are the problems consumers are facing during the recession? There’s a lot -- like they no longer can afford to travel to exotic destinations for holidays (which might be why those French perfumes seem to sell well; it’s kind of a whiff of Paris). We’re bored; we can’t afford fancy dinners anymore (which is why the sales of Lindt chocolate, McDonald’s, and Rubik's Cubes are going through the roof). We’re afraid of putting our money into stocks or banks (which is the reason why collectors' gold coins sold out twice last year in the U.S.). Start your innovation circle by letting the consumer point out all the problems, then convert these into problems.
Add a practical dimension to an irrational decision.
It has become fashionable to save and only buy on discount -- no matter who you are. What do you do as a brand owner? (Remember, discounting your brand typically takes seven years to recover!) The answer is simple: Add a practical dimension to the equation (explaining why a brand like Willeys boots is selling through the roof -- they’re practical as hell). No one wants to buy a fancy jacket at the moment, but if you’re able to add a practical dimension to your product, like designing the jacket so that the customers can turn the jacket inside out, featuring a second color (matching the evening dress), you’ve armed the consumer with a rational argument helping to lock in the deal. The fact may be that the consumer in reality is buying the jacket because they love the design, yet in recession times such arguments don’t hold -- the practical dimension does.
The systematic removal of fear.
Hyundai did it, and a stream of new banks are doing it: identifying the underlying reasoning why consumers won’t buy their services by fundamentally understanding fear and building a new and better product offering around it.
Sales might be down, but do you really know why? Answers citing the recession are invalid and useless. What counts is to understand the fundamental role of fear and to turn this around to strengthen your brand. The pre-war time in the '40s gave birth to some of the world’s greatest brands. These brands all had one thing in common: They turned a threat into an opportunity. I see no reason why you shouldn’t be able to do the same.
Saturday, December 12, 2009
Tiger Woods Disappears From Accenture Web Site; Ads Pulled
Dec. 12 (Bloomberg) -- Accenture Plc, the consulting company that built its marketing around Tiger Woods, removed him from its Web site yesterday. It also pulled print ads featuring the golfer, said a person with knowledge of the matter. An image of Woods among cactuses, rotating this week on Accenture’s main page along with photographs of a skier and skaters, was no longer on display last night. Its sponsorship page excluded any mention of Woods and a search of the site for his name returned no results. Accenture pulled ads from more than one publication, said the person, who declined to name them and sought anonymity because the decision isn’t public.
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Accent on Embarrassing
This morning, a client asked for me to look at the Accenture website. I was shocked by what I found: Tiger Woods (or his body double?), lost in the cacti, confused and trapped. Meanwhile, beneath this pathetic image, the company's Twitter scroll features this particularly harrowing phrase: Failure to learn from mistakes. The irony! During the week Tiger Woods is found out to be at best a sex addict, Accenture shows him literally lost in the weeds - and even worse - lost in Accenture's weeds.
Aghast, I continued to read the Twitter scroll and discovered another ironic message, especially given that I am writing about the company's marketing missteps this morning:
Just shut up and listen? You no longer control the conversation about your company.LOL! No kidding!
Labels:
Accenture
,
branding
,
marketing
,
Tiger Woods
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Throwing away that damaged umbrella (brand)
From today's Washington Post (see below), we read of General Motors' unprecedented dumping of its (previously invaluable) corporate brand. Instead, the company will focus solely on building individual vehicle brands.What a smart move. All the American car brands - with the exception of perhaps Ford - are black and blue after taking billions in stimulus dollars from the Red, White, and Blue. It will be years - even decades? - before these companies recover their business and their good names.
I applaud the wise GM marketing pros who made the wise decision to fold up the umbrella brand and wait until the rain has passed.
GM to Remove Its Logo From Cars, Stress Brands
By Kimberly S. Johnson
Associated Press
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
DETROIT, Aug. 25 -- General Motors will begin removing its "Mark of Excellence" logo from vehicles as the company places greater emphasis on its individual brands.
GM spokesman Terry Rhadigan said Tuesday that the company would phase out the placement of the GM logo on its cars and trucks, leaving just the GMC, Chevrolet, Cadillac or Buick logos on the vehicles.

"We really want to elevate the prominence of our four core brands," he said. GM is discontinuing or selling four brands: Hummer, Saab, Pontiac and Saturn.
The final decision to remove the silver square logo was made earlier this month, although executives had mentioned the possibility of such a move months ago. The company found that consumers had a greater affinity for GM's individual brands than the corporate name.
"What we're seeing is the GM brand gets dinged big-time in terms of considering a GM vehicle," Mike DiGiovanni, GM's executive director of global market and industry analysis, said during a monthly sales conference call in April. "But when you look at Chevrolet, Cadillac and our other brands, they haven't changed." The company began putting the logos on all its vehicles in North America in 2005.
Rhadigan said removing the logo -- which is generally placed on the lower section of the door panel -- will be more difficult on some models than on others. On vehicles where a specific indentation is made in the sheet metal for the logo, phasing it out will take longer. On models such as the Camaro or Equinox, removal is easier and will begin immediately, Rhadigan said.
Taking the logos off the vehicles will save GM a "nominal" amount of money, Rhadigan said.
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)



